November 22, 2012
My Quora answer to: How do I go from being an idea/vision guy to an idea AND execution guy?

  1. Take out your list or little black notebook of ideas. You don’t have one? And you’re (supposedly) an ideas/vision guy? Fine, start one.
     
  2. Choose the smallest one. Or, if all you have are big ideas (aww look at you, you’re sooo cool..), then take the smallest version of an idea. If your idea can reduce global poverty by 50% in 10 years, fine — shrink that by a factor of 10^whatever power. Organizing a food drive. Getting 10 friends to volunteer at a soup kitchen with you. Throwing a fundraising dinner party and getting 3 companies to sponsor it.
     
  3. Plan it out and give yourself 3 weeks to execute it. Go! Right now, get going, what are you waiting for?
     
  4. If you succeed within 3 weeks: Cross it off your list and go back to Step 2.

    If you fail by the end of those 3 weeks (likely): Finish it. Don’t go back to that damn “My Big Ideas OMG.txt” file on your desktop until you finish. Do it well and maintain your perfectionist (see: neurotic) image… or do a shitty job and feel miserable — it doesn’t matter. Just get it done.
     
  5. Go back to Step 2 and repeat. Soon enough, you’ll have a list of crossed-off ideas so long, you’ll wonder what the hell was holding you back in the first place. Now you’re ready to be That Dude/Dudette Who Has Some Decent Ideas And Executes Like A Motherf***er. Congratulations.

Execution is a muscle. If you want to strengthen it, don’t try to max out on your first set — you’ll just go nowhere. Stay humble, start small, and work your ass off.


View Answer on Quora

August 14, 2012
My Quora answer to: Has there ever been a sovereign state created by people united by an industry or line of work?

It sounds to me like you’re looking for an example of a nation-state that fulfills two very specific conditions:

1. That the nation, when defined in the most traditional IR sense, as a community of people who share a common character (their language, culture, history, etc.), identifies with a common job or industry; and

2. That the state, when defined as the governing institutions of a defined physical area and population, possesses a centralized government with unalienable authority over its territory, otherwise known as sovereignty, per the 1648 Peace of Westphalia.

I have to say that I don’t know of such an example, though I can easily think of a few that satisfy one but not the other, either because they pre-date the concept of sovereignty (ex. hunter-gatherer tribes) or because your definition of a “job or industry” isn’t clearly defined enough (ex. does a highly militant society count? or a GDP derived entirely from tourism revenues?).

However, I would point out a modern-day experiment on the limits of sovereignty that might just satisfy your curiosity eventually. From the mind of Peter Thiel:

Blueseed, a company that wants to house entrepreneurs aboard a vessel anchored near Silicon Valley, has announced that it will set sail before 2014. Nearly 150 technology startups have said they’re interested in building businesses on the high seas, according to a report recently released by Blueseed.

The idea behind Blueseed is to provide a visa-free locale where foreign entrepreneurs can create technology companies that utilize resources in Silicon Valley without having to deal with the cumbersome process of obtaining a U.S. visa.


From: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/20…

A sovereign state created by technology entrepreneurs? That’s the best I can do.

Has there ever been a sovereign state created by people united by an industry or line of work?

August 9, 2012
My Quora answer to: Who is the most intellgent being in the DC Universe?

Before we can answer this question, let’s first structure how we define “intelligence” by borrowing Dr. Robert Sternberg’s three-part theory of  intelligence (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob…), which is comprehensive but also simple enough to understand. Under this definition, there are 3 types of intelligence to consider and therefore 3 potential award categories for the title of “most intelligent being in the DC Universe.”

1. Analytical intelligence: In layman’s terms, “book smarts” or the ability to solve well-defined problems with a single correct answer. This intelligence type is essentially a measure of pure computational horsepower and therefore, the winner of this category would inevitably be Brainiac 13, who is gifted with a twelfth-level Coluan intelligence, the highest level attainable (each level signifies an increase in processing capacity by a power of 10, average human = level 1), while also possessing the ability to “infect” and control any kind of machinery akin to a computer virus — giving him virtually unlimited processing power. It’s worth noting that his gifts are the result of a genetic mutation unique to the Dox family of Colu, which is inextricably linked to a predisposition towards insanity.


2. Creative/synthetic intelligence: The ability to synthesize new answers to unusual problems from existing knowledge — thinking “outside of the box.” Creative intelligence is known among academics to be notoriously difficult to measure, so for simplicity’s sake, I  propose a simple qualitative question we can pose to identify the most creative being in the DC Universe: Assuming that every being is equipped with the same knowledge base, who would produce the most useful, original, and refined solutions to a given problem?

In my view, the answer is Ray Palmer, aka The Atom. As a world-renowned physicist, Dr. Palmer invents a matter-compression technology that allows him to shrink to subatomic size while maintaining his mass, which points to a far-above-average level of analytical intelligence. However, the key here is that he finds a near-limitless number of applications for this one ability of his. Those applications include: gliding on air currents to simulate flight, riding on phone signals for handset-enabled transportation, shrinking into Superman’s bloodstream and rearranging atoms to recreate Kryptonite (instant KO). There’s certainly room for argument, given that any DC character’s creativity will always be correlated with the creativity and effort of the given DC writer, but based on The Atom’s historical exploits, he’s in a class of his own.


3. Practical intelligence: Also known as “street smarts,”  this type of intelligence is somewhat similar to creative intelligence in that the problems are loosely defined — in the case of practical intelligence, the problem is the situation at hand, whatever it may be. The distinction here is the ability to execute the most effective and efficient solution possible, rather than to imagine a great number of possible answers. It’s in this category that some of our most revered heroes and villains are most dominant, namely Batman and Lex Luthor. These two characters reign supreme when it comes to combat tactics and strategy, as well as an uncanny knack for producing enormous amounts of wealth in their spare time. While both are blessed with above-average human intelligence, they stand out based on their ability to master any situation, usually against staggering odds — Lex Luthor in his undying mission to kill Superman and Batman in his cosmic-level exploits as a non-powered member of the Justice League. There will always be other contenders for the title of “most street-smart being in the DC Universe,” as characters find their way out of increasingly impossible situations, but I have to say that the only person capable of holding it is Batman because of his well-documented ability to win. The writers of the DC Universe will break most rules, laws of physics being foremost among those, but there’s one rule they’ll never break: Batman always wins.


Hope this clears things up.

Who is the most intellgent being in the DC Universe?

5:17pm
Filed under: comics Quora 
August 24, 2011
Empires, tech bubbles, and other stuff I didn’t plan to write about

Before I was a business nerd or a tech junkie, I was a huge history buff. The latest issue of Foreign Policy was standard bathroom reading, I consumed political narratives like a fat kid eating comic books (my favorite: the Peloponnesian War), and aspired to become Jared Diamond.

But there was always one observation from my time as a history buff that glued itself to the back of my head: History is reciprocal — an extension of the magical & immutable fact that there is a “certain underlying order” (Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time) to the significant events & movements of human history. It might be a story you’ve heard before - that history repeats itself - but that’s not exactly true. History is not repetitive, but it does tend towards parallels. Similar actions result in similar reactions… Empires rise, expand, overreach, self-destruct & so it goes. Thus, whenever I get an opportunity to apply a historian’s eye to emerging technology trends, I jump on it, and lately there have been plenty.

Obligatory mention of the B-word

The one that’s gotten the most attention, by far, is the comparison of today’s technology boom with the irrational exuberance of the ’90s dot-com bubble. To be honest, the question of whether we’re in a bubble is uninteresting to me. My thoughts on this issue are similar to those of most venture capitalists (here, here, and here): We have a decent sample of data points in history for identifying & tracking bubbles, and today’s tech industry is on its way there… but not for 2-3 years.

Four stages of a bubble

Image: 4 phases of a bubble

Tech valuations in the public markets are actually priced at historical lows, relative to earnings, implying that overall risk-taking & speculation are below saturation levels (actually, the fact that we can even talk about earnings would be a decent argument for this not being another tech bubble). In the private markets, there are certainly examples of overly-optimistic valuations at the seed and Series A stages, but I view those as the growing pains of an early-stage funding ecosystem that’s trying to become more institutionalized via angel investors turned VCs & a surplus of startup incubators/accelerators, rather than an overall divorce from reality.

But for me, the most convincing piece of evidence against a bubble is the immense gap in the technological capabilities of our private lives versus our professional ones. Using my smartphone, I can access relevant, real-time data about markets, customers & current events, faster and easier than I would working at 99% of Fortune 500 companies where I’d run into any number of problems like system redundancy, bureaucracy, poor information-sharing, etc. With a $500 laptop, anyone can power a full-grown online business from the cloud, at processing speeds & scale similar to any big corporate player.

Some would observe & proclaim this newly even playing field between individuals and corporations a “new paradigm (!!!),” but I believe it’s inevitable that enterprises will figure out how to leverage Web 2.0/3.0 technologies to re-shape big business & restore their competitive advantage. And when they do, our high expectations of today’s tech industry will finally play out. Will there be a bubble before or after that moment? Well, as we know from history, pretty things tend to rise & fall like empires — I expect nothing less this time around.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »